How to get category from JournalArticle

[Hugo Palma, módosítva 14 év-val korábban]

Hi everyone,
i have a JournalArticle and i would like to know which category it belongs to, but i can't find anything in the JournalArticle or any other class that would let me find it.

Any ideas ?
Thanks.

[Zsolt Balogh, módosítva 14 év-val korábban]

You should try this:

AssetCategoryServiceUtil.getCategories(JournalArticle.class.getName(), articleId);

[Hugo Palma, módosítva 14 év-val korábban]

Zsolt Balogh:

You should try this:

AssetCategoryServiceUtil.getCategories(JournalArticle.class.getName(), articleId);

Thanks, your reply lead me to TagsAssetServiceUtil which does the job. It seems AssetCategoryServiceUtil doesn't exist anymore.

[Zsolt Balogh, módosítva 14 év-val korábban]

I was checking that in the latest trunk, so I think it will be the future

[liferay developer, módosítva 14 év-val korábban]

Hi there,

can you explain how to get category from JournalAricle IN THE PRESENT?

I am extending journal articles portlet and I need to filter by category.

Thanks

[Roberto Tellado, módosítva 14 év-val korábban]

Hello,

In the version 6, you can filter by category in the asset publisher. You can view the code, and implement it in your code.

Sorry for my english.

Regards.

[Edouard Perr, módosítva 11 év-val korábban]

Hello,

Because it is the first result in Google concerning this question, I add the way to retrieve journal article categories (and tags).

Zsolt Balogh said :

AssetCategoryServiceUtil.getCategories(JournalArticle.class.getName(), articleId);

I tried with : ja.getId() / ja.getArticleId() / ja.getPrimaryKey() None of these worked.

Actually you need this :

List<assetcategory> categories = AssetCategoryLocalServiceUtil.getCategories(JournalArticle.class.getName(), ja.getResourcePrimKey());
List<assettag> tags = AssetTagLocalServiceUtil.getTags(JournalArticle.class.getName(), ja.getResourcePrimKey());</assettag></assetcategory>

It can be useful for new comers.
I found it in the post here, which is not well-referenced by google compared to this one.

Regards.
Edouard