Most teams don't notice platform drag until it's already cost them a campaign, a launch, or a quarter. This assessment surfaces exactly where that drag is coming from.

How It Works

Three Steps to Your Score

Answer 6 questions

One question per dimension: content velocity, integrations, localization, governance, AI readiness, and platform flexibility. Takes under 2 minutes.

See your score instantly

Get a 0–100 score with a clear breakdown across all 6 dimensions, so you know exactly where the friction is.

Take action

Use your results to prioritize what to fix first, or talk through your results with a specialist.

Question 1 of 6

2-Minute Assessment

Check Your Website Management Score

Answer 6 questions to get an instant score with a full friction-point breakdown across the areas that determine how fast and safely your organization can launch, manage, and measure your sites.

6 questions covering the key dimensions of website management
An instant score from 0 to 100 with a gap breakdown by dimension
Recommendations based on your score tier

Progress — 1 of 6

Content Velocity

When your marketing team needs to launch a new landing page or campaign, how much developer involvement is required?
Marketing agility is directly tied to how much of the publishing process lives in the hands of non-technical teams.

Marketing handles it independently using templates and visual editors → Full autonomy — fast time-to-market with no developer bottleneck Minor developer support is needed for setup, but marketing manages updates → Partial dependency — speed is manageable but not fully autonomous Most changes require a development ticket and wait time → High dependency — marketing velocity is limited by IT capacity

Integration and Data Unification

How well do your CRM, analytics, and marketing tools connect to your website platform today?
Disconnected systems create blind spots in customer data and slow down campaign execution.

Integrations are stable and data flows reliably across systems → Unified foundation — customer data is consistent across all touchpoints Some integrations work, but others require workarounds or ongoing custom maintenance → Partial integration — gaps in data consistency create operational friction Each system is largely siloed and connecting them is a significant ongoing effort → Fragmented stack — meaningful customer data unification requires major investment

Global and Localization Capability

How does your team manage content across multiple regions, languages, or brands?
As organizations scale globally, platform limitations in localization become a direct constraint on market speed and brand integrity.

Our platform handles multi-site and multi-language publishing centrally with consistent governance → Scalable localization — regions move at their own pace without sacrificing brand control We manage localization, but it requires significant manual coordination across teams or systems → Manual overhead — localization works but introduces delays and consistency risks Each region manages its own content largely independently with limited central oversight → Fragmented governance — brand consistency and efficiency are at risk as you scale

Governance and Compliance

How confident are you that your website platform meets your current security, access control, and regulatory requirements?
For regulated industries and global organizations, platform-level governance affects audit readiness and legal exposure.

Our platform enforces security and access policies natively and our compliance posture is auditable → Governance built in — requirements are met at the platform level, not worked around We meet most requirements, but some gaps depend on manual processes outside the platform → Partial coverage — compliance is manageable but fragile We have known gaps, or we are uncertain whether our platform fully meets current requirements → Significant exposure — unresolved gaps carry legal and operational risk

AI and Automation Readiness

How well does your current platform support AI-powered features and automated content workflows?
Platforms built before the AI era often require significant customization to support intelligent search, personalization, or automated publishing — if they support it at all.

AI and automation capabilities are built into the platform and actively used by our teams → AI-ready — your platform delivers intelligent experiences without major custom development We have some automation in place, but AI capabilities require third-party tools or significant custom work → Partially ready — AI value is accessible but adds cost and complexity Our platform has limited or no native AI or automation capabilities → Not equipped — modern intelligent experience capabilities would require platform-level change

Platform Flexibility and Technical Debt

If your business requirements changed significantly — new regions, new channels, new compliance rules — how would your current platform respond?
Platforms with high technical debt or rigid architecture force organizations to choose between adapting to change and maintaining what they have.

Our platform adapts well — new requirements can be addressed without significant rework → Low debt, high flexibility — modernization is an option, not a constraint We could adapt, but it would require meaningful effort and carry some risk of disruption → Manageable debt — flexibility exists but change involves real trade-offs Significant changes would require a major project or full re-platforming effort → High debt, low flexibility — the cost of change is becoming a strategic constraint

Please select an answer to continue.

Your Platform Assessment Score

Detailed Breakdown

Talk to an Expert →

What the Assessment Gives You

An overall score (0–100)

A clear indicator of your current position.

Dimension-by-dimension breakdown

Understand where you're strong and where the gaps are.

Score tier and context

See what your score means in practical, operational terms.

Recommended next steps

Guidance on what to prioritize first.

A path to expert advice

Option to connect with a platform specialist.

Link to the full guide

Additional resources to dig into your results.

What This Assessment Measures

Content Velocity

How much developer involvement your team needs to publish or update content.

Integration & Data Unification

How well your CRM, analytics, and marketing tools connect to your platform.

Global & Localization Capability

How you manage content across regions, languages, and brands.

Governance & Compliance

How confident you are in your platform's security and regulatory posture.

AI & Automation Readiness

How well your platform supports AI-powered features and automated workflows.

Platform Flexibility & Technical Debt

How your platform responds when requirements change.

Preguntas Frecuentes: Liferay DXP vs SharePoint

¿Cuál es la diferencia entre Liferay DXP y SharePoint?

La diferencia entre Liferay DXP y SharePoint radica en su finalidad principal. Microsoft SharePoint es una plataforma de colaboración y gestión de documentos basada en la web que se utiliza para almacenar, organizar, compartir y acceder a la información de forma segura.

Liferay DXP es una Plataforma de Experiencia Digital (DXP) diseñada para dar soporte a intranets, portales de clientes, portales de partners, sitios web públicos y experiencias dirigidas a múltiples públicos, todo ello dentro de una única plataforma.

¿Es SharePoint una Plataforma de Experiencia Digital (DXP)?

No, SharePoint no suele clasificarse como una plataforma de experiencia digital completa. Está diseñado principalmente para la gestión de documentos, la colaboración en contenidos y la comunicación interna dentro de Microsoft 365.

Los escenarios de experiencia digital más complejos pueden requerir herramientas, integraciones o extensiones adicionales.

¿Cuándo conviene elegir Liferay DXP?

Las organizaciones pueden optar por Liferay DXP cuando necesiten ofrecer:

Múltiples experiencias digitales dirigidas a diferentes públicos
Integración con sistemas empresariales y fuentes de datos
Personalización y segmentación basadas en roles
Servicios autenticados y flujos de trabajo complejos
Opciones de implementación flexibles (SaaS, PaaS, cloud-native, o self-hosted)

¿En qué casos es recomendable utilizar SharePoint?

SharePoint es una buena opción para organizaciones centradas en:

La comunicación interna y la colaboración
La gestión de documentos y el intercambio de archivos
El acceso exclusivo para empleados y los flujos de trabajo
Los entornos basados en Microsoft 365

¿Se puede utilizar SharePoint para crear portales de clientes?

SharePoint se puede utilizar para crear portales de clientes, pero a menudo requiere una configuración adicional, licencias o herramientas de terceros para permitir el acceso externo y gestionar escenarios más avanzados.

Las organizaciones con requisitos complejos en materia de portales externos pueden considerar el uso de plataformas diseñadas para ofrecer experiencias digitales dirigidas a múltiples públicos.

¿Cuáles son las limitaciones de SharePoint?

Entre las limitaciones habituales de SharePoint en entornos empresariales se incluyen:

Complejidad del acceso externo y el intercambio de contenidos
La gestión del cumplimiento normativo y de los registros requiere licencias adicionales
Dependencia del ecosistema de Microsoft 365 para funciones avanzadas
Dificultades a la hora de dar soporte a integraciones complejas y experiencias dirigidas a múltiples público